Art History

Client s NameDateProfessor s NameCourseRoyalty DinnerOrThree Art Works AnalyzedIn Ensor s painting The Banquet of the miserly the color combination is very striking in the piece of the form . The bright background is juxtaposed quite strikingly with a darker foreground found in the characters of the dinner . This extenuates the draw of the foreground characters , and the positions of their bodies . The smorgasbord of food is privy to a take to the woods of human debauchery and lewdness in all of these characters . Of course whenever a scene depicting a feast is presented in a painting one s mind references Da Vinci s last Supper . wherefore , since Ensor was an imitator or thought himself a type of recent student of Bosch , the dinner serves to present the spectator with a nasty display of truly human and grotesq ue featuresThe feast of sea creatures on the table pitted with the skeletons feasting and dancing on the wall behind the dinner guests are what lead the gage guard into the painting , much like The Last Supper in which the lifelike light behind the guests emphasized their actions . To sum up the sense of the effect , it seems that lust is the main ingredient in the paintingIn comparing to Ensor s solve , the gnarled painting of Justinian is more(prenominal)(prenominal) comparable in terms of sensation to The Last Supper . The sizable colors as opposed to the pastels of Ensor s employ is what make this piece very mystifying , and vivid in context . The gold is especially affective of the snarly period in which gold would symbolize purplish family (which could mean that the pastels in Ensor s organise are comparable to an emotion of high spirits which is indeed not what the painting is subscript to portray which serves in misguiding the spectator .

The stoic faces in this Byzantine work are unlike that of The Last Supper with its gentle faces and head teacher facesThe position of the bodies in this work are wide-cut frontal , and the focus is obviously on Justinian , as opposed to Ensor s work in which each act of debauchery and lewd station have their own place on the work . art object in this work , the figures seem to be offering the viewer a welcoming into their dinner , Ensor s work had a more peeperistic approach with the viewer , only allowing them to see what was expiration on , not inviting the viewer into the scene , while in The Last Supper , the viewer was also a type of voyeur , being w elcomed into a private party with the son of GodEach work is in seemingly stark contrast with one other , nonetheless , in comparison , the works seem to mix in together offering to the viewer what the other painting lacks be it a voyeur look , a welcoming , a color combination of royalty (as is seen in the Byzantine work , and equated to The Last Supper where royalty is sitting but Jesus is in pastels to Ensor s work in which pastels...If you want to get a unspoilt essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay